Sunday, May 10, 2026
Home » Trump Insists ‘We Are Very Intent on Making a Deal’ with Iran Despite Tehran’s Denial

Trump Insists ‘We Are Very Intent on Making a Deal’ with Iran Despite Tehran’s Denial

by Dean Dougn

President doubles down on talks via Kushner and Witkoff; oil tumbles, stocks rally as markets price in potential breakthrough

MARKET INSIDER – President Donald Trump emphatically told CNBC’s Joe Kernen on Monday, March 23, 2026, that the United States is “very intent on making a deal with Iran,” directly countering Iranian state media’s denial of any negotiations. In a phone interview shortly after his Truth Social post announcing a five-day pause on strikes against Iranian power plants and energy infrastructure, Trump described the discussions as “very intense” and expressed hope for “something very substantive.” He confirmed his son-in-law Jared Kushner and special envoy Steve Witkoff participated in the talks, which he said occurred as recently as Sunday night, adding that “Iran wants to make a deal badly.”

The assertion came despite Iranian state media—citing a senior security official—flatly rejecting the existence of talks, direct or indirect. “There has been no negotiation and there is no negotiation,” the official told Fars News, labeling Trump’s announcement “psychological warfare” aimed at lowering energy prices and buying time for military plans. The Foreign Ministry echoed this, insisting all de-escalation requests should be directed at Washington as the war’s instigator and reaffirming Tehran’s refusal to negotiate before achieving its objectives.

Trump dismissed the contradiction, telling Fox Business anchor Maria Bartiromo that Iran’s public denials stem from disrupted communications caused by U.S. strikes on infrastructure. “It’s hard to get any information there, because the U.S. is blowing up so much of their infrastructure,” he reportedly said.

Markets reacted strongly to the prospect of progress: U.S. stock futures rallied sharply (Dow futures briefly up over 1,000 points), the dollar weakened against major currencies, and oil prices plunged—WTI down more than 7% to around $90 per barrel and Brent off over 8% to $102—as traders priced in reduced geopolitical risk. The five-day strike deferral—conditional on continued discussions—had superseded Trump’s Saturday 48-hour ultimatum to reopen the Strait of Hormuz or face attacks on power plants.

The conflicting narratives highlight the war’s fifth-week fragility: while Trump frames the exchanges as “deep, detailed and constructive” toward a “complete and total resolution,” Iran maintains a hardline stance, threatening retaliation against regional energy and desalination facilities if its infrastructure is targeted. Potential deal elements—per earlier reports—include Hormuz reopening, limits on enriched uranium, missile program suspension, and curbs on proxy support, though Tehran’s demands (ceasefire, non-recurrence guarantees, reparations) remain far apart.

For global investors, the episode underscores extreme headline sensitivity: even disputed diplomatic signals can trigger violent moves in oil, equities, and currencies. If back-channel progress (via Egypt, Qatar, or others) quietly advances despite public denials, the current relief rally could extend—easing inflation fears and supporting risk assets. But any confirmed collapse risks renewed escalation, oil spikes, and renewed volatility.

The contrarian view: Iran’s vehement denial may be tactical—preserving leverage and domestic unity—while indirect channels continue. Markets are now betting on substance over rhetoric: verifiable Hormuz access or confidence-building steps would likely sustain the unwind of war premiums. Until clarity emerges, every official statement, proxy readout, or social-media volley will dictate direction in one of 2026’s most geopolitically driven trading environments. The next few days remain make-or-break for whether this is genuine negotiation groundwork or another layer of fog-of-war posturing.

You may also like